Assessment of the permafrost landscapes stability in Eastern Siberia: the case of Yakutia
https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-8751-2024-3-51-59
Abstract
The article provides an assessment of the stability of permafrost landscapes by two criteria: temperature and ice content of ground. The methods of assessing the stability of landscapes are presented: the Parmuzin scale, developed by him during the zoning of the north of Western Siberia by the potential possibility of thermokarst development and the Grave principle, on the basis of which a map scheme of the Yakut ASSR was previously compiled by the degree of surface sensitivity to technogenic impacts. Using the two presented methods of Parmuzin and Grave, based on the Permafrost-landscape map of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) on a scale of 1: 1,500,000, as well as maps of ground temperature of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) at the depth of the layer of annual fluctuations and ice content of surface deposits, landscape stability maps were compiled, the territory of Yakutia was divided into zones according to the degree of resistance to technogenic impacts. On the map compiled according to the Parmuzin method, landscapes according to the degree of resistance to technogenic impacts are differentiated into four gradations: unstable, relatively unstable, relatively stable and stable. Thus, according to this method, unstable landscapes occupy the smallest area of the study territory and are distributed mainly in the region with insular and discontinuous distribution of permafrost. Landscapes of the Central Yakut Plain, Prilenskoye Plateau and other lowlands with continuous permafrost distribution are characterized as relatively unstable. Relatively stable landscapes occupy the predominant part of Yakutia. Landscapes of mountainous regions are characterized as stable. According to the Grave method, landscapes on the map are divided into three gradations: relatively unstable, relatively stable and stable. According to the above-mentioned method, the territory of Central Yakutia, located in the area of highly icy soils and coastal arctic zones, is characterized as relatively unstable. The rest of the territory is assessed as relatively stable and stable.
About the Author
S. V. KalinichevaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Kalinicheva– Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Laboratory of GIS and permafrost mapping
Yakutsk
References
1. Grave, N.A. Chuvstvitel'nost' poverhnosti k tehnogennomu vozdejstviju v oblasti vechnoj merzloty, priemy i metody otrazhenija ee na kartah / N.A. Grave. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj // Metodika inzhenerno-geologicheskih issledovanij i kartirovanija oblasti vechnoj merzloty. – Jakutsk: IMZ SO RAN, 1978. – S. 16–33.
2. Grave, N.A. Principy ocenki chuvstvitel'nosti poverhnosti k tehnogennym vozdejstvijam (na primere territorii Jakutii) / N.A. Grave. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj // Ohrana prirody Jakutii. – Jakutsk, 1979. – S. 91–94.
3. Grave, N.A. Mesto i napravlenie geokriologicheskih issledovanij v probleme ohrany Sredy i racional'nogo prirodopol'zovanija v oblasti vechnoj merzloty / N.A. Grave. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj // Ustojchivost' poverhnosti k tehnogennym vozdejstvijam v oblasti vechnoj merzloty. – Jakutsk, 1980. – S. 6–12.
4. Parmuzin, S.Ju. Opyt rajonirovanija territorii s sil'nol'distymi porodami po ustojchivosti k tehnogennym vozdejstvijam (na primere Srednego Jamala) / S.Ju. Parmuzin, S.E. Suhodol'skij. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj // Ustojchivost' poverhnosti k tehnogennym vozdejstvijam v oblasti vechnoj merzloty. – Jakutsk,1980. – S.108-127.
5. Braun, Dzh. Narushenie poverhnosti i ee zashhita pri osvoenii Severa / Dzh. Braun, N. A. Grave. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1981. – 88 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
6. Stashenko, A.I. Ustojchivost' prirodnyh kompleksov kotlovin Stanovogo nagor'ja k tehnogennym narushenijam / A.I. Stashenko – Tekst : neposredstvennyj // Izv. VGO. – 1983. – T.115, vyp.4. – S.294-300.
7. Bosikov, N.P. Merzlotnye landshafty zony osvoenija Leno-Aldanskogo mezhdurech'ja / N.P. Bosikov, I.S. Vasil'ev, A.N. Fedorov. – Jakutsk, 1985. – 124 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
8. Jakutija [Pod red. S.S. Korzhueva]. – M.: Nauka, 1965. – 467 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
9. Agroklimaticheskie resursy Jakutskoj ASSR [Otv. red. Mozolevskaja A.K] – L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1973 – 112 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
10. Klimat Rossii [Pod. red. N.V. Kobyshevoj]. – SPb.: Gidrometeoizdat, 2001. – 654 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
11. Danilov, Ju.G. Landshafty Jakutii / Ju. G. Danilov, A. N. Fedorov, Zh. F. Degteva i dr. - Jakutsk: Izdatel'skij dom Sev.-Vost. federal'nogo un-ta, 2016. – 75 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
12. Merzlota v nashe vremja [Pod red. K. Joshikava] – Jakutsk : Centr sociogumanitarnyh issledovanij, 2021. – 280 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
13. Fedorov, A.N. Merzlotnye landshafty Jakutii: metodika vydelenija i voprosy kartografirovanija / A.N. Fedorov. – Jakutsk: In-t merzlotovedenija SO AN SSSR, 1991. – 140 s. – Tekst : neposredstvennyj.
14. Parmuzin, S.Ju. Rajonirovanie severa Zapadnoj Sibiri po potencial'noj vozmozhnosti razvitija termokarsta // Voprosy geokriologicheskogo kartirovanija. – Jakutsk, 1986. – 78-85.
15. Merzlotno-landshaftnaja karta Respubliki Saha (Jakutija). Masshtab 1: 1 500 000 / Fedorov A.N. [i dr.]; [red. M.N. Zheleznjak]. – Jakutsk.: IM SO RAN, 2017. – 2 l.
Review
For citations:
Kalinicheva S.V. Assessment of the permafrost landscapes stability in Eastern Siberia: the case of Yakutia. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University Series "Earth Sciences". 2024;(3):51-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-8751-2024-3-51-59