Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University Series "Earth Sciences"

Advanced search

Study of the impact of failure criteria on wellbore stability during drilling

https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-8751-2025-1-5-18

Abstract

The instability of an open wellbore during directional and horizontal drilling is a critical issue that can lead to emergencies and significant economic losses. One of the key methods to prevent wellbore collapse is the careful selection of drilling fluid density based on geomechanical modeling. The objective of this study is a comparative analysis of the influence of the most commonly used failure criteria (Coulomb-Mohr, Drucker-Prager, HoekBrown, Mohr-Coulomb, and Lade) on the calculation of drilling fluid density required to ensure wellbore stability. The work involves one-dimensional geomechanical modeling using the RN-SIGMA 2.0 software package with logging data (density, interval transit times of longitudinal and transverse waves) from five wells obtained from open sources. We calculated profiles of geostatic and pore pressures, dynamic and static elastic properties (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio), strength properties (uniaxial compressive and tensile strength limits, internal friction angle), as well as horizontal stresses according to a poroelastic model. The results showed that the choice of failure criterion significantly affects the required drilling fluid density to prevent wellbore collapse. The lowest density values were obtained using the Lade criterion, while the highest values corresponded to the HoekBrown and Drucker-Prager criteria. The classical linear Coulomb-Mohr criterion yielded intermediate density values. These differences are due to different mathematical formulations of the criteria and their consideration of various rock failure mechanisms. The findings indicate the necessity of carefully selecting a failure criterion appropriate for the lithology and mechanical properties of specific rock intervals.

About the Author

A. Е. Kolesov
M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr E. KOLESOV – Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor, Department Subsoil Use

ResearcherID: P-9732-2015

Scopus Author ID: 56049440100

Yakutsk



References

1. Potapov RA, Zhirnov RA, Izosimov DI, et al. Analysis of complications during construction of directional production wells at the Eastern Siberian field. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2018;1(33):26–32 (in Russian).

2. Parfiriev VA, Zakirov NN, Vaganov YuV et al. Well construction problems in Eastern Siberia and ways to solve them. Oil and gas studies. 2019;1(133):52–-57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31660/0445-0108-2019-1-52-57.

3. Parfiriev VA, Paleev SA, Vaganov YuV. Analysis of oil well construction in complicated conditions at the fields of Eastern Siberia. Oil and gas studies. 2016; 6(120):97–100 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31660/0445-0108-2016-6-97-100.

4. Arkhipov AI, Yastrebov PV. Classification of geomechanical criteria for rock destruction and prospects for operational geomechanical support of well construction. Bulletin of the Association of Drilling Contractors. 2020;(2):34–39 (in Russian).

5. Zhang L, Cao P, Radha KC. Evaluation of rock strength criteria for wellbore stability analysis. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2010;47(8):1304–16. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.001.

6. Colmenares LB, Zoback MD. A statistical evaluation of intact rock failure criteria constrained by polyaxial test data for five different rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2002;39(6):695–729.

7. Rahimi R, Nygaard R. What difference does selection of failure criteria make in wellbore stability analysis? In: Proceedings of the 48th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium; 2014: 2114–27.

8. Shi Y, Ma T, Zhang D, Chen Y, Liu Y, Deng C. Analytical model of wellbore stability analysis of inclined well based on the advantageous synergy among the five strength criteria. Geofluids. 2023; doi:10.1155/2023/2201870.

9. Mahetaji M, Brahma J. A critical review of rock failure Criteria: A scope of Machine learning approach. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2024;159:107998. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.107998.

10. Latypov ID, Valeeva EZ, Ardislamova DR, et al. Experience in the application of geomechanical modeling when drilling wells in a zone with an active tectonic setting. Oil industry. 2022:(12):90–95 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2022-12-90-95.

11. Fadeeva VA, Samoilov MI, Pavlov VA, et al. Use of preliminary 1D geomechanical model for planning core studies. Geology, geophysics and development of oil and gas fields. 2020;7:29–35 (in Russian). DOI:10.30713/2413-5011-2020-7(343)-29-35.

12. Fjær E. Relations between static and dynamic moduli of sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Prospecting. 2019;67:128-139. DOI:10.1111/1365-2478.12711

13. Lacy LL. Dynamic rock mechanics testing for optimized fracture designs. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas. 1997. DOI: 10.2118/38716-MS

14. Shen S, Gao Y, Jia L. A comparison of the relationship between dynamic and static rock mechanical parameters. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(11):4487. DOI:10.3390/app14114487

15. Zoback MD. Reservoir geomechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. DOI:10.1017/ CBO9780511586477

16. Kolesov AE. Numerical solution of poroelasticity problems associated with the development of oil fields. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2015;3(47):63–74 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kolesov A.Е. Study of the impact of failure criteria on wellbore stability during drilling. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University Series "Earth Sciences". 2025;(3):5-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2587-8751-2025-1-5-18

Views: 8


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8751 (Online)