A spatial assessment of environmental vulnerability in the Akhangaran river basin, Uzbekistan

In the context of increasing anthropogenic pressure and the need for objective environmental monitoring, spatial assessment of ecological vulnerability that takes into account natural and technogenic factors has become an important scientific task. The aim of this study was to assess the ecological vulnerability of the Akhangaran River Basin (Uzbekistan) using a comprehensive geographic information system approach. The materials used included multitemporal Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 satellite imagery from 2022 to 2025, cadastral land-use data, the Copernicus GLO-30 Digital Elevation Model, and OpenLandMap soil bulk density data. Data processing was carried out in Google Earth Engine, including the derivation of spectral indices such as the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index, Normalised Difference Drought Index, Normalised Difference Built-up Index, Bare Soil Index, Land Surface Temperature, and Clay Mineral Ratio. Based on the normalised parameters, an integrated Ecological Vulnerability Index was developed using a correlation-weighted scheme that accounts for indicator multicollinearity. Results showed that 59.6% of the basin area falls within zones of high vulnerability. A clear spatial differentiation was identified: while mountainous forest areas retain relative ecological resilience, agricultural, industrial, and residential zones are characterised by elevated environmental stress, soil compaction, and pronounced thermal anomalies. The practical significance of this research lies in the potential application of its findings to state environmental and land monitoring, as well as in the identification of priority areas for environmental management. Future research may focus on  improving the indicator set and adapting the proposed methodology to other river basins and natural-technogenic geosystems in Uzbekistan.

1. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. On the approval of the regulation on the procedure for monitoring, evaluating, and developing reporting forms on measures to combat land degradation and publishing their results (Resolution No. 50). LexUZ. 2023. Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/7502407#7502411 (in Russian)

2. Republic of Uzbekistan. On approval of the Concept on Environmental Protection in the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030 (Decree No. DP-5863). LexUZ. 2019. Available at: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/6971721#6971727 (in Russian)

3. Republic of Uzbekistan. On improving the environmental monitoring system in the Republic of Uzbekistan (Resolution No. 737). LexUZ. 2019. Available at: https://lex.uz/en/docs/7269658#7269662 (in Russian)

4. Republic of Uzbekistan. On additional measures to expand the use of aerospace data in the sectors of the economy and to improve the management system at the grassroots level of agriculture (Decree No. DP-177). LexUZ. 2025. Available at: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/7752491#7752495 (in Russian)

5. Fazilova D, Makhmudov M, Magdiev K. Analysis of crustal movements in the Angren-Almalyk Mining Industrial Area using GNSS data. International Journal of Geoinformatics. 2023;19(11). DOI: 10.52939/ijg.v19i11.2915

6. Magdiev K, Fazilova D, Makhmudov M, et al. GIS-based ecological vulnerability assessment in a mountainous region: The Charvak Reservoir, Uzbekistan. Forum Geografi. 2026;40(1). DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.13377

7. Chaudhary S, Pandey AC. PCA driven watershed prioritization based on runoff modeling and drought severity assessment in parts of Koel river basin, Jharkhand (India). Water Science & Technology Water Supply. 2021;22(2):2034–2054. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2021.297

8. Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2017;202:18–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.03

9. U. S. Geological Survey. Landsat 8–9 Collection 2 Level-2 Science Product Guide (LSDS-1619, Version 6.0). 2024. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/landsat-8-9-512-collection-2-level-2-science-product-guide

10. Fornasaro S, Ghezzi L, Shukurov N, et al. Water quality and dissolved load in the Chirchik and Akhangaran river basins (Uzbekistan, Central Asia). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2024;196(9):854. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13014-1

11. Saidaliyeva Z, Shahgedanova M, Yapiyev V, et al. Precipitation in the mountains of Central Asia: isotopic composition and source regions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2024;24(21):12203–12224. DOI: 10.5194/acp-24-12203-2024

12. Kadirkhodjaev A, Andreev D, Akramov B, et al. Assessing climate change impacts on groundwater recharge and storage using MODFLOW in the Akhangaran River Alluvial Aquifer, eastern Uzbekistan. Water. 2025;17(15):2291. DOI: 10.3390/w17152291

13. European Space Agency. Copernicus Global Digital Elevation Model. Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem. 2024. DOI: 10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65

14. Cadastre Agency of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National geoinformation system (NGIS) open data portal. Available at: https://open.ngis.uz/ (in Russian)

15. U. S. Geological Survey. Landsat Collection 2 Quality Assessment Bands. USGS Landsat Missions. 2025. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat-collection-2-quality-assessment-bands

16. Potapov P, Hansen MC, Kommareddy I, et al. Landsat Analysis Ready Data for Global Land Cover and Land Cover Change Mapping. Remote Sensing. 2020;12(3):426. DOI: 10.3390/rs12030426

17. Nussbaum A, Support LPS. Worldwide Reference System (WRS) - NASA Science. NASA Science. 2025. Available at: https://science.nasa.gov/mission/landsat/worldwide-reference-system/

18. Flood, N. (2013). Seasonal composite Landsat TM/ETM+ images using the medoid (a multidimensional median). Remote Sensing, 5(12), 6481–6500. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5126481

19. Hengl T. Soil bulk density (fine earth) 10 x kg / m-cubic at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1475970

20. Richards JA. Remote sensing Digital image analysis. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2

21. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP). Understanding the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset (Report No. 373-07-01). 2025. Available at: https://epsg.org

22. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, NASA SP-351. 1974:309–317.

23. Gao B. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1996;58(3):257–266. DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00067-3

24. Patil PP, Jagtap MP, Khatri N, et al. Exploration and advancement of NDDI leveraging NDVI and NDWI in Indian semi-arid regions: A remote sensing-based study. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering. 2023;9:100573. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100573

25. Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2003;24(3):583–594. DOI: 10.1080/01431160304987

26. Mzid N, Pignatti S, Huang W, Casa R. An analysis of bare soil occurrence in arable croplands for remote sensing topsoil applications. Remote Sensing. 2021;13(3):474. DOI: 10.3390/rs13030474

27. Dogan H. Mineral composite assessment of Kelkit River Basin in Turkey by means of remote sensing. Journal of Earth System Science. 2009;118:701–710. DOI: 10.1007/s12040-009-0059-9

28. Yu X, Guo X, Wu Z. Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 TIRS—Comparison between radiative transfer equation-based method, split window algorithm and single channel method. Remote Sensing. 2014;6(10):9829–9852. DOI: 10.3390/rs6109829

29. Shi J, Gao G, Liu J, et al. Ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of small watersheds in Hilly Regions using sensitivity-resilience-pressure modeling. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 2025;13(3):209–224. DOI: 10.26599/jgse.2025.9280050

30. Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics. 2010;2(4):433–459. DOI: 10.1002/wics.101

31. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

32. OECD/JRC (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing.

33. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2024). Composite Indicators Toolkit — Step 6: Weighting. Knowledge4Policy. URL: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/composite-indicators/toolkit_en/navigation-page/10-step-guide_en/step-6-weighting_en

34. Diakoulaki D., Mavrotas G., Papayannakis L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770.

35. Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x

36. High-Level Panel on the Development of a Multidimensional Vulnerability Index. Multidimensional vulnerability index: Final report. United Nations. 2024. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/Final_MVI_report.pdf

37. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice-Hall.

38. Shukurov N, Pen-Mouratov S, Steinberger Y, Kersten M. Soil biogeochemical properties of Angren industrial area, Uzbekistan. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2009;9(3):206–215. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-009-0079-8

39. Rasul A, Balzter H, Ibrahim GRF, et al. Applying Built-Up and Bare-Soil Indices from Landsat 8 to Cities in Dry Climates. Land. 2018;7(3):81. DOI: 10.3390/land7030081

40. Bandowe BAM, Shukurov N, Leimer S, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils of an industrial area in semi-arid Uzbekistan: spatial distribution, relationship with trace metals and risk assessment. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2021;43(11):4847–4861. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-021-00974-3

41. Shukurov N, Pen-Mouratov S, Steinberger Y. The impact of Almalyk industrial complex on soil chemical and biological properties. Environmental Pollution. 2005;136:331–340.

42. Zhang T, Gao B, Zhou Z, Chang Y. The movement and deposition of PM2.5 in the upper respiratory tract for the patients with heart failure: an elementary CFD study. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2016;15(S2):138. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0281-z

43. Pope CA, Bhatnagar A, McCracken JP, et al. Exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with endothelial injury and systemic inflammation. Circulation Research. 2016;119(11):1204–1214. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.116.309279